HUH! RUSH LIMBAUGH AND I SHARE PERFECT SOLUTION: ‘GRANT ILLEGALS PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP – BUT THEY CAN’T VOTE FOR THE NEXT 25 YEARS’
RUSH LIMBAUGH TO CHRIS WALLACE ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION:
@rushlimbaugh on @FoxNewsSunday : “I would be willing right here to support an effort to grant permanent citizenship to whatever number of illegal immigrants there are in the country, tomorrow, if you will make as part of the deal they can’t vote for 15-25 years.” @FoxNewspic.twitter.com/25hQpkA7aZ
Here’s my 2016 article:
FOR TRUMP: COMMON SENSE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION SOLUTION- BUILD THE WALL, NO CITIZENSHIP FOR 25-40 YEARS ( MEANS NO VOTING FOR THEM ), AND DEPORT ONLY CRIMINALS
LIMBAUGH CALLS FOR CONCEALED-CARRY IN SCHOOLS:’WE HAVE ARMED SECURITY AT EVERY PUBLIC ENTITY EXCEPT SCHOOLS’
Rush Limbaugh joined Chris Wallace on FOX News Sunday today to discuss Florida school massacre, NRA and gun control hysteria.
“The solution is concealed-carry in schools. If we are really serious about protecting the kids, we need a mechanism to be defensive when this kind of thing happens…
We have armed security at virtually every public entity in this country except schools. For some reason they are gun free zones and everybody who wants to shoot up a school knows they are unarmed… Bashing the NRA isn’t going to do it.”
We’ve got to realize this is what our country has become. We can wish it weren’t this way and we can wish Congress could legislate it away. But they can’t. It’s not the fault of the NRA. It’s the fault of people doing thi
Via FOX News Sunday:
- Rush Limbaugh: It seems to me that this is a process crime/perjury trap, and if I were Trump’s lawyers, I wouldn’t let him get anywhere near this!
RUSH LIMBAUGH: I know a little bit more about the law because my dad was a lawyer and my cousins, uncles and stuff were judges.And I know a lot of big time, famous lawyers now. But I would not profess to be a legal expert.
It seems to me that this is a process crime/perjury trap, and if I were Trump’s lawyers, I wouldn’t let him get anywhere near this! In the first place, Trump improvises as he goes.
You know, if the interview is just with Trump and his lawyers in a relaxed setting with Mueller and his anti-Trump investigators, that’s one thing.
But if it’s a grand jury appearance which I don’t think it is yet. But if it’s a grand jury appearance, then Trump’s lawyers can’t go in there (snorts) and you tell one little lie in there and you are done. You’re under oath, and you have no assistance. You have no aides. You have nobody in there that can help you. You have nobody in there to tell the prosecute he can’t ask the question, ’cause the prosecutor owns the grand jury.
So, no, you don’t do that. If it’s just an interview… This may surprise some people. If it’s just… I say “relaxed.” If it’s just an interview in somebody’s office and you have Mueller and a couple of his investigators and Trump and his lawyer — even if the session is not formally under oath, they can still circle back and get you for lying to them, if they think that you have. Even though it isn’t under oath. If you agree to this kind of a sit down.
So Mueller wants to ask Trump why he fired Comey and why he fired Flynn. You can see what kind of trap this is. Trump doesn’t owe anybody an explanation on this. But there are still people who think that they can force one out of him. I would also reject the offer, if it’s made — which I don’t think it would be. But there’s a possibility that Trump’s lawyers could say, “You know, we’ll do this, but we want it in writing. You submit your questions in writing, and then we’ll answer them in writing.”
RUSH LIMBAUGH: Steve Bannon has now earned a Trumpian nickname. When that happens to you, that’s not good. I mean, Crooked Hillary will always now forever be known as Crooked Hillary. To a certain extent, Lyin’ Ted, I mean, he’s always gonna have that moniker. And now Sloppy Steve.
…One of the things that I happened to mention yesterday was that everybody knows, or has known, that most of the leaking coming out of the White House had been Steve Bannon. You’d be stunned at the number of people who knew. Bannon was spending so much time with Maggie Haberman at the New York Times. He was spending a lot of time with people at The Politico. Everybody knew this, and I by no means was the only one saying it. (chuckling) But you wouldn’t know that if you’re watching Fox & Friends today because, apparently, I’m the only guy who’s made this public!
- Mike Flynn did not plead to guilty to scheme ( Russia collusion).
- Pleading guilty to the scheme proves the existence of a criminal conspiracy.
- He pleaded guilty to a process crime
- Robert Mueller does not have proof of a scheme
“Speculation of Flynn now cooperating with Mueller’s investigation stirred in recent days due to reports that Flynn had pulled out of a join defense agreement or common interest arrangement to share information with other subjects of the investigation,” said Limbaugh
“But there is nothing unusual about that. Once again, the lack of understanding by the drive-by media reporters — oh — Flynn’s pulling out of the joint agreement to share information, that means he’s getting ready to flip.”
“No, it meant he was getting ready to make a deal with the prosecutor, as such, it becomes unethical for the two lawyers or teams to communicate with each other when one of the people involved is going to cop a plea,” Limbaugh said.
“There was nothing unusual about this, and didn’t mean anything other than Flynn was getting close to make a deal,”
Limbaugh then expertly explains why Flynn’s guilty plea is nowhere near are damaging as the mainstream media would like people to believe.
“This is a key point now,” Limbaugh begins, “When the prosecutor, Mueller, has a cooperator, Flynn, who was an accomplice in a major criminal scheme — a cooperator, Flynn, is made to plead guilty to the scheme.”
“This is critical because pleading guilty to the scheme proves the existence of a criminal conspiracy.”
“And then,” Limbaugh added, “when the perp allocutes, like tells the judge what he did, the accomplice, Flynn, explains the scheme and the actions taken by himself and his co-conspirators to carry out the scheme.”
“This goes a long way to proving the case.”
“You have a perp pleading guilty to a scheme that he was part of and then explains the scheme and all the other people involved.”
Arriving to his main point, Limbaugh says “That’s not what happened here today!”
“Flynn did not plead guilty to a scheme!”
“He pleaded guilty to a process crime.”
“Mueller does not have proof of a scheme,” said Limbaugh.
Limbaugh concludes the segment by saying the Flynn’s plea ultimately shows Mueller have no proof of collusion between the Trump team and Russia.
On Friday, Michael Flynn plead guilty to lying to FBI agents about making contact with Russian Ambassador Kislyak during the transition period.
Audio credit: DailyRushbo
BUSTED! RUSH LIMBAUGH ON ROY MOORE ACCUSER’S CLAIM BEING LOCKED IN CAR IN 1977: Cars child lock started in early eighties.
Rush Limbaugh on Roy Moore’s accuser, Beverly Young Nelson, claim about being locked inside a car with Moore in 1977 where she thought she would be raped:
Cars began to be built with the child lock feature in the early eighties.
Transcript via DailyRushbo
LIMBAUGH: “Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore is denying that he ever met the woman who on Monday accused him of sexually assaulting her in a diner parking lot in 1977 when she was an underage teenager, calling her allegations ‘absolutely false,’ despite his apparent signature in her high school yearbook. ‘I can tell you without hesitation this is absolutely false. I never did what she said I did. I don’t even know the woman.
[…]This is 1977? Somebody tell me: In 1977, were there child locks on the door? In other words, could the driver push a button that would make sure all windows and doors could not be opened? Was that present in 1977, because she says she couldn’t get out. But did child locks…? Were they in 1977 vehicles. I’m trying to remember what I had in 1977. I had a Pontiac… Well, it was a pretty big Pontiac. The car I had didn’t have them in there. But I didn’t drive every car that’s out there. You know, the button on the driver’s side where you can flip it and nobody can open a door.
It’s to protect kids from opening windows and doors when the car is moving. But if that wasn’t present… (interruption) Child-locking mechanisms have been required since 19… (interruption) Contained…? (interruption) Okay. They’ve been in the automobile since the early eighties. They’ve been required, is that what you’re saying? Required in automobiles since the early eighties? Cars have been built with the feature, not required. Cars began to be built with the child lock feature in the early eighties.
So it might be safe to assume that the door she was sitting next to she could have unlocked it, unless Roy Moore had a special custom lock called the female anti-escape lock on the passenger side of the front seat of his car. Well, she says she’s being overpowered. His hands are around her neck. Isn’t that right?
Rush Limbaugh: Weinstein needs to hire the CEO of bimbo eruptions, and that is Hillary Clinton. She is the original bimbo eruptions bully. And as the most cheated-on woman in America, you couldn’t do better in hiring somebody who knows exactly how you need it blamed on a vast right-wing conspiracy
Transcript as follows (courtesy of RushLimbaugh.com):
My second See, I Told You So was I thought a very clever theory, a very clever idea that I thought that would be so offensive to the left, although this is not why I announced the theory, but I thought they would be so outraged at this that they would be excoriating me left and right. And it is the theory that says if you’re Harvey Weinstein or any other man under siege the way he is, that you don’t need to go out and hire the highest reputed crisis PR company. You need to go hire the CEO of bimbo eruptions.
The CEO of bimbo eruptions could be of great service to Hollywood’s casting couch movers and shakers. Hillary Clinton is the expert in dealing with this. Hillary Clinton is incomparable. There is nobody that knows how to best destroy women who come forward with these allegations than Hillary Clinton. If you’re Harvey Weinstein and you want this to go away, you need to hire the woman who made it go away for the president of the United States, who made it go away for the entire Democrat Party. You need to hire the CEO of bimbo eruptions, and that is Hillary Clinton. There is nobody better.
Harvey and his ilk should not skimp. Hillary has led the most successful War on Women ever. She saved her husband’s name. She saved her husband’s governorship and presidency and the Democrat Party. You think Harvey Weinstein was a bully? You haven’t seen anything until you are a woman who claimed that Bill Clinton made a move on her and Hillary Clinton got involved. Hillary Clinton is the original bimbo eruptions bully.
And as the most cheated-on woman in America, you couldn’t do better in hiring somebody who knows exactly how you need it blamed on a vast right-wing conspiracy. You need it blamed on the conservative players of Hollywood or somehow for setting Harvey up, Hillary Clinton is the woman to do it. If there’s anybody who knows how to get rid of female attackers, women claiming that your husband sexually molested or abused them, it’s Hillary Clinton. You don’t need crisis PR. You need Hillary Clinton. And nobody refuted it. Maybe it’s so damn right on that the best thing they could do was just ignore it.