James Comey

BLACK LIVES MATTER DERAIL JAMES COMEY HOWARD UNIVERSITY SPEECH: ‘GET OUT JAMES COMEY! YOU AIN’T MY HOMIE’

Posted on Updated on

 

Black Lives Matter protesters during James Comey’s speech at Howard University:

  •  Get out James Comey! You ain’t my homie!”
  • “Black lives they matter here!”
  • “F— James Comey”
  • “No justice, no peace!”
  • Protesters sang, “We Shall Not Be Moved”

 

From Fox News:

Noisy protesters shouted and chanted over James Comey on Friday as he attempted to deliver a convocation address at Howard University, forcing him to delay his remarks and then practically drowning out the rest of his speech.

 The protest started as soon as the former FBI director took the podium at the historically black college in Washington, D.C.

Protesters raised their right fists in the air and chanted, “We shall not be moved.” They also said, “F— James Comey” and “No justice, no peace.”

Comey was unable to speak at first due to the disruption. After several minutes, Comey tried to begin. “I hope you’ll stay and listen to what I have to say. … I listened to you for five minutes,” he said, before pausing again.

After several more minutes of protests, Comey launched into his prepared speech – which, ironically, was about how the rest of the world is often “too noisy” to take time to reflect, whereas Howard University represents an “island.”

Comey had to raise his voice throughout the address as the chanting persisted. The protesters later said they were with the group HU Resist and were protesting “state-sanctioned violence.”

The rowdy scene marked a rough start for Comey at Howard, where he’s joined the faculty as a lecturer.

Read more: Former FBI director’s convocation derailed by angry protesters at Howard University

 

WH: DOJ SHOULD LOOK AT PROSECUTING JAMES COMEY…GUTLESS WIMPS!

Posted on Updated on

 

( Fox News ) The Department of Justice should consider prosecuting James Comey for his “improper” actions while serving as FBI director, the White House said Tuesday.

Sarah Sanders, the White House press secretary, argued during the daily press briefing that Comey’s actions as FBI director “were improper and likely could have been illegal.”

Asked if President Trump wants the Department of Justice to prosecute Comey, Sanders said that’s “something they should certainly look at.”

Sanders said the former FBI director “politicized an investigation by signaling he would exonerate Hillary Clinton before he ever interviewed her or other key witnesses.”

That’s in reference to new allegations Comey drafted an “exoneration statement” for Clinton weeks before interviewing her during the investigation into her email server.

 

Sanders also said Comey, “by his own admission, leaked privileged government information.”

That’s in apparent reference to Comey’s acknowledgement during a June congressional hearing that he authorized the leaking of a memo about his conversations with the president to the New York Times.

“I think if there’s ever a moment where we feel someone’s broken the law, particularly if they’re the head of the FBI, then I think that’s something [that] certainly should be looked at,” she said.

Her comments were in response to former chief strategist Steve Bannon, who told CBS News’ “60 Minutes” that Trump’s decision to fire Comey was perhaps the worst mistake in “modern political history” because it paved the way for the special counsel’s Russia investigation.

Read more: White House: DOJ ‘should certainly look at’ prosecuting James Comey

CHRISTOPHER STEELE TRUMP DOSSIER USED UNVERIFIED SOURCES, SENT TO JOHN MCCAIN, USED BY COMEY TO OBTAIN FISA

Posted on

Photo published for How Ex-Spy Christopher Steele Compiled His Explosive Trump-Russia Dossier

 

  • Mr. Steele acknowledges dossier came from “unsolicited intelligence” and “raw intelligence” that “needed to be analyzed and further investigated/verified.”
  • Christopher Steele said he followed proper internal channels by giving the dossier to Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican
  • Christopher Steele reportedly met with the FBI on Aug. 22
  • James Comey considered the dossier so important that he insisted it be included in January’s final Intelligence Community Report on Russian meddling in the election and reportedly offered Steele $50,000 to corroborate the dossier
  • The dossier was part of the evidence the FBI used to obtain a FISA warrant
  • Mr. Steele says the ultimate responsibility lies with BuzzFeed, the liberal news website whose editor, Ben Smith, decided to post the entire 35 pages — memos from June to December — on Jan. 10 even though Mr. Smith said he doubted the far-flung accusations were true.
  •  Mr. Steele and his Orbis Business Intelligence firm are facing defamation lawsuit brought by Aleksej Gubarev, chief executive of the network solutions firm XBT Holdings,

 

British spy behind Trump dossier ordered to give deposition in BuzzFeed suit

 

Pamela Browne

 

 

Christopher Steele reportedly met with the FBI on Aug. 22. The dossier was part of the evidence the FBI used to obtain a FISA warrant to monitor communications of Carter Page, a peripheral adviser in the Trump campaign.

Former FBI Director James Comey considered the dossier so important that he insisted it be included in January’s final Intelligence Community Report on Russian meddling in the election and reportedly offered Steele $50,000 to corroborate the dossier—something the bureau denies paying.

…”We know from what Steele has said in the British lawsuit that – at Fusion’s instruction – he briefed reporters at The New York Times, the Washington Post, Yahoo News, the New Yorker, CNN and Mother Jones about the dossier,” Fray-Witzer said. “To their credit, not a one of them actually published the dossier. Only BuzzFeed did that and we think that says something about where BuzzFeed’s priorities were.  This was about “clicks,” not about responsible reporting.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/24/british-spy-behind-trump-dossier-ordered-to-give-deposition-in-buzzfeed-suit.html

 

Photo published for Christopher Steele Has Revealed Trump Dossier Sources & Names to the FBI - IR.net

 

Ex-spy admits anti-Trump dossier unverified, blames Buzzfeed for publishing

 

By Rowan Scarborough – The Washington Times
Tuesday, April 25, 2017

 

Christopher Steele, the former British spy who wrote the infamous anti-Donald Trump dossier, acknowledges that a sensational charge his sources made about a tech company CEO and Democratic Party hacking is unverified.

In a court filing, Mr. Steele also says his accusations against the president and his aides about a supposed Russian hacking conspiracy were never supposed to be made public, much less posted in full on a website for the world to see on Jan. 10.

He defends himself by saying he was betrayed by his client and that he followed proper internal channels by giving the dossier to Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, to alert the U.S. government.

Mr. Steele has not spoken publicly about his disputed opposition research project, but for the first time he is being forced to talk in a London court through his attorneys.

Barristers for Mr. Steele and his Orbis Business Intelligence firm filed their first defense against a defamation lawsuit brought by Aleksej Gubarev, chief executive of the network solutions firm XBT Holdings.

Mr. Steele acknowledges that the part of the 35-page dossier that identified Mr. Gubarev as a rogue hacker came from “unsolicited intelligence” and “raw intelligence” that “needed to be analyzed and further investigated/verified.”

 

Read the rest of this entry »

JAMES COMEY TURNED DOWN HILLARY CLINTON EMAILS FROM NSA FILE…WHAT THE?

Posted on Updated on

 

Is this guy under the Clinton payroll? Former FBI director James Comey turned down NSA offer to give them Hillary Clinton emails that’s in their possession.

New York Post reports:

Remember, the Republicans now control this committee. So bad news isn’t going to be stifled anymore.

Clinton, you probably remember, “lost” her private emails, which she’d been storing on a personal computer server. Comey chastised her harshly in a televised speech but then said there was a unanimous decision not to recommend prosecution.

Clinton’s emails, which were stolen by the Russians, have never been found. But as I’ve mentioned numerous times, the messages are still in the possession of the National Security Agency (NSA), which offered to give them to the FBI.

Comey turned down that offer, according to a source who has been very reliable.

I’ve also mentioned that Comey fibbed when he said his agents unanimously agreed that prosecution was unnecessary. In fact, my source says that FBI agents were irate about the decision not to go after Clinton

 

PERJURY! JAMES COMEY COMMITTED PERJURY FOR HILLARY CLINTON AND BARACK OBAMA…WHY NOT?

Posted on

 

 

Former FBI director James Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton three months before investigation was conducted in July.

Back in September 2016, Comey appeared before the House Judiciary Committee and lied like an expert crook.

Last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee produced documents that showed Comey had decided to exonerate Clinton before the first witness was even interviewed.

Comey contradicted himself saying he exonerated crooked Hill AFTER FBI probe. Comey was caught lying, under oath, committing perjury.

Andy McCarthy says we shouldn’t be shocked. In early April, Obama told Comey what the correct answer was.

The decision not to indict Hillary Clinton was not made by then-FBI Director Comey. It was made by President Obama and his Justice Department – Comey’s superiors. If you want to say Comey went along for the ride rather than bucking the tide (as he concedes doing when Lynch directed him to call the Clinton probe a “matter,” not an “investigation”), that’s fair. But the fact that Comey already knew in April what he would say in July has long been perfectly obvious. The Obama administration was going to follow its leader. What Comey ultimately stated was just a repeat of what Obama was openly saying in April, and what Obama’s Justice Department was leaking to the press in May.

 

James Comey lying under oath before Texas Representative John Ratcliffe.

This is the exchange:

Mr. GOODLATTE. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas.

Mr. Ratcliffe, for 5 minutes.

Mr. RATCLIFFE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Director, did you make the decision not to recommend criminal charges relating to classified information before or after Hillary Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on July the 2nd?

Mr. COMEY. After.

Mr. RATCLIFFE. Okay. Then I am going to need your help in trying to understand how that is possible. I think there are a lot of prosecutors or former prosecutors that are shaking our heads at
how that could be the case.

 

 

 

 

 

 

OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE! OBAMA IS BEHIND COMEY’S DECISION TO EXONERATE HILLARY CLINTON

Posted on Updated on

It Wasn’t Comey’s Decision to Exonerate Hillary – It Was Obama’s.

Is that not obstruction of  justice? The legal definition of obstructing justice is impeding or obstructing those who have duties or powers of administering justice. Is Obama going to be investigated on this? Don’t hold your breath because it’s not going to happen. Obama was ‘untouchable’ when president and it will remain now that he’s ex-president. How about equal protection. Is Trump being treated equally like Obama?

National Review’s Andrew McCarthy believes Barack Obama was the puppet master behind Comey’s decision and lap dog Comey had to obey the master.

 

National Review reports:

Let’s think about what else was going on in April 2016. I’ve written about it a number of times over the last year-plus, such as in a column a few months back: On April 10, 2016, President Obama publicly stated that Hillary Clinton had shown “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security (which is not an element of the [criminal statutes relevant to her e-mail scandal]). The president acknowledged that classified information had been transmitted via Secretary Clinton’s server, but he suggested that, in the greater scheme of things, its importance had been vastly overstated. This is precisely the reasoning that Comey relied on in ultimately absolving Clinton, as I recounted in the same column: On July 5, 2016, FBI director James Comey publicly stated that Clinton had been “extremely careless” in using a private email server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security (which is not an element of the relevant criminal statute).

The director acknowledged that classified information had been transmitted via Secretary Clinton’s server, but he suggested that, in the greater scheme of things, it was just a small percentage of the emails involved. Obama’s April statements are the significant ones. They told us how this was going to go. The rest is just details. In his April 10 comments, Obama made the obvious explicit: He did not want the certain Democratic nominee, the candidate he was backing to succeed him, to be indicted. Conveniently, his remarks (inevitably echoed by Comey) did not mention that an intent to endanger national security was not an element of the criminal offenses Clinton was suspected of committing – in classic Obama fashion, he was urging her innocence of a strawman crime while dodging any discussion of the crimes she had actually committed.

As we also now know – but as Obama knew at the time – the president himself had communicated with Clinton over her non-secure, private communications system, using an alias. The Obama administration refused to disclose these several e-mail exchanges because they undoubtedly involve classified conversations between the president and his secretary of state. It would not have been possible to prosecute Mrs. Clinton for mishandling classified information without its being clear that President Obama had engaged in the same conduct. The administration was never, ever going to allow that to happen.

 

 

 

CROOKED JAMES COMEY COMMITTED PERJURY: HIS APRIL MEMO AGAINST HIS SEPTEMBER CONGRESS TESTIMONY

Posted on

On September 28th, 2016, Texas GOP Rep. John Ratcliffe asked then FBI Director James Comey, under oath, this question:

“Director, did you make the decision not to recommend criminal charges relating to classified information before or after Hillary Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on July 2nd?”

Comey’s answer under oath?

“after”

 

In reality:

In April or early May of 2016, Mr. Comey had already decided he would issue a statement exonerating Secretary Clinton.  That was long before FBI agents finished their work.  Mr. Comey even circulated an early draft statement to select members of senior FBI leadership.

 

Former Congressman Jason Chaffetz believes James Comey may have committed perjury.

Fox News Insider reports:

Jason Chaffetz said former FBI Director James Comey has a lot of “explaining to do” in light of new reports that he began drafting a statement exonerating Hillary Clinton even before interviewing key witnesses, including the former secretary of state.

“He’s certainly got a lot of explaining to do. He could have perjured himself,” the former House oversight committee chairman said on “Fox & Friends.”

 

Townhall reports:

According to new transcripts released by the Senate Judiciary Thursday afternoon, former FBI Director James Comey made the decision not to refer then Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for prosecution long before ever interviewing key witnesses. Members of the Committee allege Comey made the decision months before FBI agents were finished with the criminal investigation of her mishandling classified information during her time as Secretary of State.

The transcripts were revealed in a letter sent to current FBI Director Christopher Wray, in which lawmakers are demanding an explanation and more documents surrounding the case.

“According to the unredacted portions of the transcripts, it appears that in April or early May of 2016, Mr. Comey had already decided he would issue a statement exonerating Secretary Clinton.  That was long before FBI agents finished their work.  Mr. Comey even circulated an early draft statement to select members of senior FBI leadership.  The outcome of an investigation should not be prejudged while FBI agents are still hard at work trying to gather the facts,” the letter, signed by Chairman Chuck Grassley and Committee member Lindsey Graham states. “Conclusion first, fact-gathering second—that’s no way to run an investigation.  The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.”