FISA

OBAMA ADMIN SET UP RUSSIAN PLAYERS MEETING WITH TRUMP JR., AN EXCUSE USED TO WIRETAP TRUMP CAMPAIGN

Posted on Updated on

OBAMAGATE! Looks like the DNC and Obama admin used Russian players to create a meeting with Trump Jr. as part of a wider setup to get a FISA warrant to wiretap phones of the Trump campaign during 2016.

Russian lobbyist and ‘spy’ Rinat Akhmetshin admitted Friday that he attended, together with  Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, a June 2016 meeting with Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort at the Trump Tower in Manhattan.

After this ‘Russia meeting,’ Obama administration  asked – but was denied- FISA warrant to wiretap phones of the Trump campaign.

Trump’s campaign manager Paul Manafort’s phone was illegally bugged during the infamous ‘Russia meeting’. Remember, the wiretapping was illegal, as FISA court denied Obama’s June 2016 request.

But it did not stop the Obama administration from wiretapping and setting up the fake narrative of Trump-Russia collusion.

The June meeting may have also served as the basis of the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia.

 

Both Natalia Veselnitskaya and Rinat Akhmetshin  have connections with the Democrat Party. Rinat Akhmetshin worked for anti-Trump Fusion GPS, the organization behind the fake Trump Russia dossier. AG Loretta Lynch gave Veselnitskaya special visa to stay in US and was seen with Democrat officials around D.C. events.

Akhmetshin was linked to Fusion GPS and involved in a pro-Russian campaign in 2016 which involved lobbying congressional staffers to undermine the Magnitsky Act.

Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson cancelled his testimony before Congress next week.

Medium reported:

Today, Fusion GPS employee Rinat Akhmetshin today confirmed his attendance at a meeting with Donald Trump Jr, Paul Manafort, and Jared Kushner along with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya.

Accusations have arisen that the meeting was part of a wider setup to achieve a FISA warrant to wiretap phones of the Trump campaign during 2016. President Trump himself has accused the FBI under Loretta Lynch of wiretapping his campaign.

 

 

SOURCE: Medium

FISA LAW GAVE OBAMA AUTHORITY TO WIRETAP TRUMP THROUGH HIS ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA LYNCH

Posted on Updated on

 

This is the FISA law:  the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath.

When Trump accused Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower during 2016 campaign referring to a Breitbart article published last Friday, he already knows what FISA is and what power it gives to a President.

According to Breitbart, the first request on June was denied. The second request came last October and although there was no proof of their Russian claim against Trump, the wiretapping continue.

1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request, uncharacteristically, is denied.

4. October: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National Review later notes. The Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.

FISA hardly rejects warrant requests. From 1979 through 2015, the FISA court received over 38,000 warrant requests. Only 12 were rejected (0.03%).. According to ABC News, out of 10,700 FISA applications submitted between 2009 and 2015, only one was rejected in its entirety. The fact that the FBI’s warrant applications were rejected despite of court’s extremely low bar for probable cause, it could be seen as an indication that the bureau’s case was not only weak but also invalid.

 

From a January 11, 2017 Guardian article:

The Guardian has learned that the FBI applied for a warrant from the foreign intelligence surveillance (Fisa) court over the summer in order to monitor four members of the Trump team suspected of irregular contacts with Russian officials. The Fisa court turned down the application asking FBI counter-intelligence investigators to narrow its focus. According to one report, the FBI was finally granted a warrant in October, but that has not been confirmed, and it is not clear whether any warrant led to a full investigation

In Chapter 36 of Title 50 of the US Code *War and National Defense”, Subchapter 1, Section 1802, we read the following:

(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that—

(A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at—
(i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or
(ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title;

(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and

(C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801(h) of this title; and
if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.